![]() ![]() Secondly, each phase must be completed before the following stage can begin. This makes planning straightforward and easily measurable. Using the initial scope, detailed requirements are given upfront, meaning that clients and project managers have discussed and agreed upon what will be delivered and when. This means there is a clear list of things the project must provide. ![]() First of all, the scope is fixed from the beginning on. There are a few main characteristics of this methodology that set it apart from the agile method. The waterfall methodology, considered to be a traditional method, is made up of several phases, each taking place one after another in a logical sequence. Waterfall – The difference between the two approaches The Waterfall Approach And if you don’t put any thought into the methodology question and pick an approach that is not ideal in your case, your project may face big challenges to deliver the expected result for the client, within the timeframe and budget agreed. ![]() How you involve the client and so on.ĭepending on your project, there is a method that best suits that specific project. How you go about collecting requirements. Put simply, project methodology describes the way a project is managed. Why does the choice of methodology matter? And we’ll share with you some criteria that we believe should be driving your decision.īut before explaining the characteristics of each methodology, let’s briefly discuss the importance of this decision. In this article, we will look at the question from a real-world perspective. And depending on who you ask, you’ll get different answers. Should you use agile or follow the familiar waterfall approach? There is also the question of methodology. Before delving into a project, many decisions need to be made: From scope to resources to timeline. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |